2.03.2013

Argentina Is First Nation Censured by IMF for Economic Data

Why There's No Real Inflation (Yet)


According to Milton Friedman, "inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon." If that is true, then you have to wonder where the heck all of the inflation is. Every central bank in the Western world is holding interest rates down, and almost all of them are printing money like it's going out of style. Five years ago, nearly every economist in the world would have told you this would cause inflation to skyrocket, and the big deficits governments were running would make matters even worse. Taken together, monetary and fiscal policies are far more extreme than they have ever been. Yet, inflation has remained rather tame at 2%. In Friedman's world that just wouldn't be possible. What does it all mean?.... It means even Nobel Prize-winning economists can get it wrong-at least in the short run. Here's why Friedman has been wrong on inflation so far. It starts with his basic theory.

Paul Krugman May Be the World's Last Flat Earth Economist


Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Dr. Paul Krugman is at it again. A favorite of the Keynesian crowd, he claimed earlier this week that fixing the deficit is important but added that "doing it now would be disastrous." He also observed that the 10-year U.S. debt situation isn't really all that bad. At least he's consistent. I'll give him that. For five years now Dr. Krugman has argued that increasing U.S. government spending is vital to our nation's recovery. And for five years he's been dead wrong. Since this crisis began, the United States has spent trillions...more money than any nation in history. In the process, it's gone from being the world's biggest creditor to the biggest debtor of all time. In fact, our national debt is now so high that people literally can't count the zeros. So most have thrown up their hands in exasperation and given up trying. Now, to be perfectly clear, I don't believe Dr. Krugman is stupid. Far from it - you don't win Nobel Prizes for being an idiot. However, I do believe that he's trapped in the past--an acolyte of sorts to failed economic policies and doctrine that dates to the 1930s. Some people, like University of Chicago Finance Professor John H. Cochrane, are more pointed, noting that if Krugman were a scientist, he'd be akin to a "flat-earther," an "AIDS-HIV disbeliever" or somebody who believes the continents don't actually move. This makes him very dangerous in the scheme of things because Dr. Krugman's solution is that "we" just haven't spent enough money...yet. I don't know how he can make that argument with a straight face.

IMF sees 140m jobs shortage in aging China as 'Lewis Point' hits

Twin crises in Italy and Spain stalk markets as political unrest prevails


The escalating political crises in Italy and Spain are being watched with growing concern by bond investors, fearful that both countries could slide into paralysis and lose the crucial backing of the European Central Bank.

Revolutionary Japan is suddenly the centre of world affairs

Italy risks political crisis as MPS bank scandal turns 'explosive'

Spain's crisis strategy under fire as economy buckles again

Mario Draghi confronts Berlin over contagion from Cyprus default

Russia shuns euro bonds on North-South rift, rotates into stocks

David Cameron has one great ally: the people of Europe

Central bankers should be brought to heel by elected parliaments

Britain becomes Germany's biggest trade partner as Berlin-London pact deepens

Previous entries